Dance
Scottish Ballet: Stravinsky
Theatre Royal, Glasgow
Mary Brennan
five stars
Touring success in America, high-profile awards and nominations - artistic director Christopher Hampson’s short progress report preceded a double bill that confirmed Scottish Ballet’s status as a forward-looking company with strengths nonetheless grounded in the classics. His own response to Stravinsky’s Rite of Spring confirms this: a searingly intense study of two brothers driven asunder by beliefs that make the elder (Christopher Harrison) into a brutish aggressor with the younger (Constant Vigier) falling victim to juggernaut-idealogy. The choreography between them is unrelentingly physical, Vigier constantly bounced off the curving walls of the gladiatorial enclosure by Harrison’s relentless attack while Sophie Martin is both observer and catalyst as Faith/Death - her pointe-work poised, incisive and her whole being speaking of something compelling, yet unattainable.
Before the interval, Constance Devernay glinted and shone with glacial, enigmatic charm in the late Sir Kenneth MacMillan’s The Fairy Kiss (1960), re-designed and revived by Scottish Ballet to mark the 25th anniversary of his death. At times MacMillan’s version of Hans Christian Andersen’s The Ice Maiden swithers between classic tradition and radical invention: the peasant gatherings that attend the Young Man’s imminent wedding echo similar festivities in Giselle or Coppelia - ah, but then, the pas-de-deux soar into the bravura dynamics that became a hallmark of his later work. Andrew Peasgood (the Young Man) and Bethany Kingsley-Garner (his Fiancee) are in the arms - and lifts - of sweetly naive bliss until the Fairy (Devernay) claims the lad with a fatal kiss. Devernay’s limbs lick round him with a possessive, predatory embrace and the handsomely athletic Peasgood is hers to command, pouring immaculate control into challengingly complex partnering where lifts and holds are tinged with acrobatic brinkmanship. Can ice sizzle? It does here!
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here