Fringe Theatre
Check-Up
Traverse Theatre
****
The Abode
Underbelly
****
Neil Cooper
MARK Thomas should be on prescription. While the relationship between good health and humour has long been established, the only danger of Thomas’ latest show is that it may make you angry enough to burst a blood vessel.
The premise is simple. On the 70th anniversary of the National Health Service, what state is it in now? The answers, as revealed by Thomas through statistical evidence and a series of interviews with health-care workers, is not great. As he moves from office to operating theatre, Thomas finds a swathe of dedicated professionals caught in a mire of an ideology only concerned with profit.
Throughout Thomas’s urgent life and death observations, Nicolas Kent’s production manages to be righteous, moving and funny in a very necessary plea for a similar injection of humanity into those currently strangling the life out of the NHS.
Not everything is black and white in The Abode, Davey Anderson’s new play, performed with agit-prop gusto by the young ensemble from Pepperdine University, the American institution which has forged ongoing relationships with playwrights from Scotland.
Here, Anderson, director Cathy Thomas-Grant and their 13-strong ensemble take a discomforting peek into the appeal of extreme right wing ideology to disaffected young white men. This is seen through the eyes of Samuel, who finds a sense of belonging through an alt-right cell.
Watching such a young cast act out some of the adolescent insecurities they’re probably in the midst of squaring up to themselves is an oddly reassuring experience in a very necessary salve to the current state of fear and loathing. Anderson shows how ideas and words can be hijacked, and how those behind them are hiding in plain sight. As the cast make clear over the show’s 70 minutes, the real voice of America is here.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here