Music
RSNO/Oundjian
Royal Albert Hall, London
Keith Bruce
five stars
EVEN with the full forces of the RSNO Chorus and Huddersfield Choral Society (who share the skills of Gregory Batsleer as chorus-master) seated behind the orchestra, there was still room for a few of the capacity audience to occupy choir stall seating above them, facing conductor Peter Oundjian on what was his final appearance as music director of the RSNO. Although not the best seats in the house acoustically, they would have a particular perspective on his direction of the most meticulous and measured account of Benjamin Britten’s War Requiem.
While that fact is also an indication of the sheer scale of the home of the BBC Proms, which the work matches in its additional requirement for two distinct orchestral ensembles and a choir of young people - the RSNO Junior Chorus and their chamber organ accompanist, Edward Cohen, sounding superb from the top level of the auditorium, there was a palpable intimacy about the performance of what is a masterpiece for a secular cathedral, albeit one that uses the text of the Latin Mass and which was first heard in a real one.
With his male soloists, tenor Allan Clayton and baritone Russell Braun, alongside him and soprano Erin Wall in the middle of the choristers, and the chamber orchestra led by Sharon Roffman on his right, with Maya Iwabuchi in her place as concertmaster of the main band, there was always an element of theatre in the flow of the work, but its sonic drama surpasses anything you can see.
The chorus set the benchmark in that with the attention-grabbing pianissimo singing of the opening, even before we heard the young folk from the gods, or the combination of Clayton and the chamber ensemble on the setting of Wilfred Owen’s best-known verse. Everyone on stage was on top form, but the tenor in particular excelled in terms of pure tone and perfect diction.
As the layers of vocal ingredients unfolded in the closing Libera Me movement, there was another inaudible sensation in the Royal Albert Hall: the sound of six thousand people listening with a shared emotional intensity.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here