Opera
Rigoletto
Theatre Royal, Glasgow
Keith Bruce
four stars
SEVEN years on from Matthew Richardson’s production of Verdi’s melodrama of lust and seduction for Scottish Opera first appearing on the Theatre Royal stage, its revival looks precisely targeted to address the way the toxicity of male power has been revealed in the news, with the Duke of Mantua a Weinstein, Cosby or Berlusconi of his era. Far from simplifying the dynamic of the opera, however, those contemporary parallels seem to have drawn thoughtful and nuanced performances from the singers in a staging that is often most notable for its acting.
In the title role as court jester Rigoletto, a cynical procurer for his boss but obsessive protector of his daughter Gilda, Greek baritone Aris Argiris brings a sympathetic Zero Mostel-approach to a show filled with other references to 20th century American culture like Broadway musicals and film noir. Tenor Adam Smith also gives the Duke some impression of sincere self-delusion in his devotion to “love” so that the expression of true beliefs in La donna e mobile in the third act is all the more striking.
There is complexity of character in the women as well, with Lina Johnson’s child-like Gilda, girlishly balancing on a window sill for her Act 1 aria, learning the awfulness of men fatally fast but not losing her emotional naivety, and Sioned Gwen Davies seen making herself up to become scarlet-frocked seductress Maddelena behind the Duke’s back.
Of a cast that has half a dozen company debuts, Johnson walks off with the vocal honours from that “Caro nome” until the bleak, bare-stage final scene. Argiris was not on top form, suffering from a cold for which the indulgence of the audience was requested at the start, and Smith seems to lack the chops to deal with one of the most demanding and familiar tenor roles in the repertoire. The quartet that follows his big number was very fine indeed, however, and the two dozen-strong male chorus are a glory of this production, while conductor Rumon Gamba and the orchestra are on top form in the pit.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here