Music
Scottish Chamber Orchestra
City Hall, Glasgow
Keith Bruce
five stars
THE first of a series of three concerts featuring the music of Mendelssohn, and directed by three fasci-nating conductors, this programme set the bar very high indeed for what promises to be a superb end to the concert year by the SCO.
The composer’s late cantata Walpurgisnacht, not simply setting a fable by Goethe but created in part-nership with the writer, is less performed these days than its genesis warrants, perhaps because it re-quires the participation of tenor and contralto singers in little more than cameo roles. Martin Mit-terrutzner and the statuesque Hilary Summers were both in fine voice, but the bulk of the singing was by baritone Huw Montague Rendall, whose differentiation between roles in the story was first rate, and the SCO chorus, proving once again that it is in a class of its own with this repertoire.
Not only is it a narrative work of huge charm created by two masters of their art, Walpurgisnacht also has profound political message that still resonates as well as being fashioned from ingredients that are once again quite a la mode. The fine instrumental playing included particularly memorable clarinet by William Stafford.
This was an unusual-looking SCO, with seven brass for the preceding overture and incidental music for A Midsummer Night’s Dream, among the best known and melodically finest of the composer’s work. Conductor Laurence Equilbey made it sound absolutely fresh with her meticulous attention to dynamic range and detail and the rigorous rhythmic pulse that throbbed through the entire performance. Join-ing the women of the chorus here were mezzo Jessica Gillingwater and the now very familiar soprano Rowan Pierce, whose presence is a welcome treat on any concert platform.
Composed at either end of Mendelssohn’s tragically brief career, this music is the story of a precocious teenage talent and a mature master craftsman that everyone knows, even when they don’t know that they do, but this concert made it seem like an entirely new tale.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel