Theatre
The Electrifying Mr Johnston
The Studio, Edinburgh
Neil Cooper
****
HISTORY is a fickle beast, and the states-people who stride through it can be lionised one minute, reviled the next. Such complexities and contradictions are thrown into the air for serious contemplation in Robert Dawson Scott’s fascinating dramatic study of one-time Scottish socialist firebrand Tom Johnston, who drove the creation of hydro-electric power stations in the Highlands. While it is taken for granted that this changed the social landscape for the better, some of the collateral damage left in its wake begs to differ.
Dawson Scott calls Johnston to account through the figure of Sandy MacKenzie, an idealistic young journalist, who as a young student lends his political idol a copy of Johnston’s own book, Our Scots Noble Families, but never receives the return he once expected.
Such is the way of realpolitik in Dawson Scott’s script for Alasdair McCrone’s Mull Theatre production, currently on a suitably energised cross-country tour. With Stephen Clyde taking on the role of Johnston with understated gravitas, Dawson Scott is aiming higher than hagiography. The play’s store is set out from an early conversation about Winston Churchill between MacKenzie and a pukka Westminster apparatchik played by Beth Marshall. This duly points up the ambiguities of Johnston’s actions that follow, exposing the thin line between political heroism and villainy.
Dawson Scott doesn’t stop there. As MacKenzie - played by Alan MacKenzie - gets a gig on the Daily Herald, no less, he calls out his former hero on the construction companies building the new stations and their track record of fatalities on site, the use of cheap migrant labour and a failure to recognise trade unions.
But this is too subtle for polemic, and is cannily alert to the nuances of compromise required to serve a seemingly higher cause which may well end up as folly. Set against Alan Melvin’s plugged-in backdrop and pulsed by Martin Low’s piano-based score, Dawson Scott’s play offers up a knowing glimpse at how power works, even when it doesn’t.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here