The Wanderers
Tim Pears
Bloomsbury, £14.99
Review by Nick Major
FOR a long while after the First World War, it became de rigueur to idealise the Edwardian period as a series of innocent garden parties carried out on pristine English lawns. In Tim Pears’s second book in his West Country Trilogy, the prevailing image of the pre-war period is of a harsh moorland interspersed with tangled thickets and copses, and populated by social outcasts and rag-tag travellers. For the 13-year old Leo Sercombe there is not a cream tea in sight as he walks and rides through Devonshire towards Cornwall.
Pears has chosen as his epigraph a passage from Genesis where God banishes Cain to wander the earth in sin. At the beginning of The Wanderers, Leo too has been banished, but from the farm of his childhood where he grew up. The narrative, however, is not simply an aimless tramp, although there is plenty of enjoyable wayfaring. Leo is looking to reach Penzance, where he thinks some of his family might still live. Ill and starving, he is picked up by a band of gypsies, who take him in, even though he is a gentile. But life among them is cruel. It seems, like Cain, Leo is destined to be flogged by everyone he meets.
After being forced to race a white colt for money, Leo escapes and ends up working at a farm. Pears writes some devastating and brutal scenes here that are truly difficult to read. One involves Leo’s "friend" Wilf forcing him to behead a live sparrow with his teeth. Leo often wonders why he meets violence wherever he goes. "Perhaps there was some oddity in his manner that provoked people. Something of the runt about him, of the hen-pecked or nag-ridden." Or perhaps, "it was simply that there existed more violence in the world, in man, than he happened to feel within himself".
Pears matches this violence with beauty: exquisite, startling and detailed descriptions of the countryside. Even though the novel’s action is seen through Leo’s eyes, often the human drama is the backdrop to the natural world. This works well. Leo, after all, is more interested in nature than humans, but it is also indicative of the novel’s central flaw: Pears is better at writing about our relationship with nature than our relationship with each other. Too often the scenes of human conflict are poorly paced or seem unnecessarily truncated.
Leo’s story is partnered with his lost friend Lottie’s, the daughter of the estate Leo was forced to leave. Lottie also has little time for people. She is engrossed in the biological sciences, and spends her time dissecting rats and picking flowers, seemingly unaware that her father is courting her best friend. We are given to believe Leo and Lottie’s stories are held together because of their young longing for each other, yet they scarcely think of one another. As a result, the book becomes two novels, hardly related.
Pears’s painterly style, however, should keep the reader engrossed. He creates clear-eyed portraits of a lost way of life, and of a people whose traditions were disregarded throughout most of the 20th century. This is most keenly felt in the character of Rufus, the hermit tramp who becomes Leo’s saviour. Country life used to be populated by these eccentric gypsies, pagans and mystics. The Wanderers invites them in to our imaginations once again. For all its faults, Pears’s book is an odd sort of triumph: a novel for those who – in the words of that old folk song – ain’t got no home in this world any more.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here