FRAMPLER
Sometimes you just wish a word was more commonly used. A frampler is, according to the Dictionary of the Scots Language (DSL, www.dsl.ac.uk), “a rowdy, quarrelsome person”, but there is only one witness given: Sir Walter Scott, in The Monastery (1820). The Oxford English Dictionary (OED) adds one more-recent citation from The Guardian (1987), putting an imaginary line into the mouth of the then-distinguished Edinburgh MP Malcolm Rifkind: “The Honourable Member … is a frampler, a gabnash and a bletherskite, who has probably been on the rammle.”
The noun frample is recorded in a couple of 19th-century Ayrshire sources, meaning “a confused mass, a tangle”, and there is even a “chiming” adverb frimple-frample “in a confused, promiscuous or tangled manner”.
DSL suggests that frample is “a conflation of frumple and fankle”. Fankle as both verb and noun is well-attested from the eighteenth century onwards. Frumple is much rarer; it is recorded in English (sometimes spelled fromple rather than frumple) into the early 17th century, but then it disappears from view, only to re-emerge in John Jamieson’s Supplement to the Etymological Dictionary of the Scottish Language (1825), glossed “to crease, to crumple”.
DSL suggests Scott’s use was “influenced by … Eng[lish] frampold, of a horse, fiery, mettlesome”, a word witnessed for the most part from the 1600s; Scott used the word frampal in Peveril of the Peak (1822), a novel set in the seventeenth century and drawing on the author’s profound historical knowledge.
Wherever it’s from, I think we can agree that frampler is worth a revival.
Scots Word of the Week is written by Pauline Cairns Speitel of Scottish Language Dictionaries located at 9 Coates Crescent, Edinburgh.
Visit their website at www.scotsdictionaries.org.uk
You can also contact them by email at mail@scotsdictionaries.org.uk.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article