Music
RSNO
Usher Hall, Edinburgh
Keith Bruce
five stars
WHATEVER his superstition about the number, Mahler did not intend his Symphony No 9 to be a valedictory statement, but that has not stopped subsequent generations – who have had the advantage over the composer of listening to a performance – from hearing it as such. There is no such ambiguity about conductor Peter Oundjian’s choice of the work for his last concerts with the Royal Scottish National Orchestra as its music director (saving a BBC Prom concert of Britten’s War Requiem in September).
What a bold choice it was too, if partly for all the ambiguities the work embraces. Mahler 9 is a difficult work to unpack: the second movement may contain music that is as jolly as the composer ever gets, but it is immediately undercut in a way that pulls the rug from any notions of sincerity in that. But as well as wrestling with its complexity, the listener cannot help be beguiled by the work’s function as a showcase for the symphony orchestra, and one that, although large, is less garnished with sonic novelties than some other Mahler works.
It nonetheless delights in the broadest range of pitch with the basses, double bassoon, bass clarinet, and tuba as essential as the piccolo and E flat clarinet. The latter initiates a glorious first movement passage that moves on to flute and then leader, Maya Iwabuchi, that was surely breaking new ground over a century ago, just as a passage for muted trombones had a few minutes earlier.
Every detail of all this shone out in Oundjian’s reading, and in the superb playing for him of the musicians, but at the end it was the RSNO strings that really produced the goods, fittingly for a man whose career began as a violinist. Building around the solo figure for principal cello Aleksei Kiseliov, all four string sections combined in a world-class performance of the finale that became a most extraordinarily moving farewell.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here