Theatre
The Crucible
Theatre Royal, Glasgow
Keith Bruce
three stars
THERE is an apposite, if anachronistic quotation from the writings of 7:84's John McGrath in the programme for Selladoor's touring production of Arthur Miller's great allegorical drama about the Salem witch trials. "Theatre can never 'cause' social change. It can articulate pressure towards one . . . ," it begins. That is a broad hint towards what turns out to be the chief difficulty with Douglas Rintoul's production. Although it is narratively assured – the many layers of personal relationships in the unfolding drama are rarely as lucidly expressed as they are by this company – it is also both determined that the audience never forgets it is watching a piece of theatre, and very keen to make explicit the link with McCarthyism and the House UnAmerican Activities Committee.
The latter aim seems to me to skew the court-room third act, where Jonathan Tafler is allowed free rein to go the full Simon Callow as Danforth, rather than be the sober, if pompous, circuit judge that Miller wrote. This means that proceedings, and the dialectic that drives them, are allowed to upstage the human drama of John and Elizabeth Proctor after all the good work that Eoin Slattery and Victoria Yeates have put in before the interval.
The self-conscious theatricality of the production is, however, arguably more distracting – not just the visibility of the stanchions folding up the flats of Anouk Schlitz's spare design, and actors making their way through the wings for their entrance, but particularly the projection of stage directions on to the set of which the first one "Enter Thomas Putnam, a man with many grievances" is far from the most unnecessary.
All of which is a shame, because Yeates, Slattery, Charlie Condou as a rather young-looking Reverend Hale, and Lucy Keirl's striking Abigail Williams, head up a very accomplished cast in what is otherwise a gripping evening.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here