Giving the public the final say on who should be champion of Strictly Come Dancing has led to a number of surprise results in previous years – and could deliver another one tonight.
History shows that the person who finishes at the top of the leaderboard in the final is not always the one who goes on to lift the glitterball trophy.
In fact, across the 15 series of Strictly there have been seven occasions when the public has ignored the opinions of the judges and handed victory to someone other than the celebrity in first place.
It happened as recently as last year, when Alexandra Burke finished at the top of the leaderboard in the final, only for the trophy to go to Joe McFadden, who finished second.
In 2015 Jay McGuiness ended the final in third place but still picked up the trophy.
And both Darren Gough (in 2005) and Tom Chambers (2008) also finished third on the leaderboard, before triumphing in the public vote and winning the series.
Overall there have been nearly as many Strictly champions who did not finish first on the leaderboard (seven) as those who did (eight).
It is a trend that could bode well for two of tonight’s finalists, Joe Sugg and Stacey Dooley.
Both have regularly received lower scores than the other two finalists, Ashley Roberts and Faye Tozer – but neither Sugg nor Dooley have ever appeared in a dance-off, suggesting they have strong public support.
Roberts, by contrast, has been in the dance-off three times, and on each occasion has remained in the competition thanks only to the judges’ backing.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article