BRITAIN'S trade gap widened in August, despite hopes that a weaker pound had been boosting exports in the wake of the Brexit vote.
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) said the UK's deficit on trade in goods and services hit £4.7 billion in August, missing economist forecasts for £4 billion, widening by £2.5bn from July.
The figures showed that imports rose by £2.6bn, while exports only grew by £100 million.
It comes despite hopes that the post-referendum slump in sterling would help support Britain's export industry.
Sterling has fallen to fresh three-decade lows this week to trade near 1.242 against the US dollar and 1.117 against the euro in Friday morning trade.
Theoretically, a weaker pound should make British goods less expensive and more competitive on the international stage.
"But in general, a close long-run relationship between export and import prices is to be expected, as other factors such as raw material and labour prices are also significant price drivers and tend to move in the same direction over a long time period," the ONS said.
The statistics noted that, while export prices grew at a faster rate than imports in August - up 0.7 per cent and 0.1 per cent respectively - it could be chalked up to a delayed reaction from July's import price rise, adding it was still "unclear" whether sterling depreciation had an impact.
Howard Archer, chief European and UK economist at IHS Markit, said: "After a recent stream of resilient, reassuring data and surveys on the UK economy, the August trade and industrial production data are somewhat disappointing."
Mr Archer said the data has "diluted hopes" that net trade would have made a positive contribution to third quarter gross domestic product (GDP), which he expects to grow by 0.4 per cent from the previous quarter.
Britain's powerhouse service sector saw its trade surplus grow by £100 million to £7.4bn in August, with exports estimated to have hit £19.3bn.
But the sector-by-sector breakdown in goods trade paints a bleaker picture for Britain's widening trade deficit.
Good exports were supported by a £300m rise in material manufacturers, a £100m jump in chemicals, and a £200m increase in aircraft exports.
However, that total was dragged down by a £300m drop in ship exports and a £200m fall in oil exports in August.
Meanwhile, machinery and transport equipment made up the bulk of August imports, rising £1.8bn, while chemical and miscellaneous manufactures each rose by £300m. Food, beverage and tobacco imports rose by £200m and material manufactures grew by £100m.
Goods exports to the EU dropped 0.6 per cent, or £100m, to £12.4bn, thanks in part to a drop in exports to the Netherlands.
UK imports from the bloc rose 5.1%, or £1bn, to £20.8bn, as Britain bought more goods from Germany, France, the Czech Republic, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands and Slovakia in August.
International Trade Secretary Liam Fox said: "While some sectors continue to perform well, there is still some way to go to ensure that we are exporting as much as we could and should do, so the Government will continue to encourage and support the wider range of exporting we require to boost our national prosperity."
Mr Fox earlier this week said that the immigration status of EU nationals living in Britain would be "one of our main cards" in the country's Brexit negotiations.
He also claimed that the UK would be able to secure international free trade deals after Article 50 is triggered simply by an "exchange of letters" with countries that already have agreements with the EU and would like to continue trading on similar terms.
Commenting on Friday's trade figures, he said: "We are working hard to ensure the UK remains an attractive place with which to trade and to help UK companies take advantage of the global demand for British goods and services."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here