Business chiefs have urged the Government to prioritise the building of Crossrail 2.
The proposed north-south rail line running across London between Hertfordshire and Surrey would “make a difference to the whole country”, according to more than 70 bosses of firms in the region.
In a letter to Chancellor Philip Hammond and Transport Secretary Chris Grayling, they said 40% of the transport benefits will be outside the capital while 60,000 supply chain jobs and apprenticeships would be created across the UK.
The signatories warned that an already overcrowded regional transport network “threatens to stunt growth across the entire nation” as people struggle to get to work.
They also predicted that the journey time benefits of the HS2 high-speed rail project will be lost in queuing for onward services at Euston station.
Crossrail 2 would cost about £30 billion at 2014 prices.
London Mayor Sadiq Khan said: “Despite the project benefiting the whole of the UK, London has actually met half the funding cost. What we now need is for the Government to take note of these benefits and give us the green light to progress, for the good of the entire country.”
The line would run as far north as Broxbourne in Hertfordshire and as far south as Epsom in Surrey, passing through central London via places such as Tottenham Court Road, Victoria, Chelsea and Clapham Junction.
Construction could start in the early 2020s and the railway could be open by 2033.
Research published by think-tank IPPR North last month found that the imbalance in transport infrastructure investment between London and the rest of England is set to get even worse.
More than half (54%) of spending on the country’s transport networks is going to the capital, according to the analysis. Some £1,943 is being spent per person in London on current or planned projects compared with just £427 in the North.
A Government spokesman said: “We have now received the Strategic Outline Business Case from Transport for London and will carefully consider it to ensure it is robust and includes a fair, sustainable and deliverable funding plan.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel