NFU Scotland, the Scottish Beef Association (SBA) and the Scottish Association of Meat Wholesalers (SAMW) have written a joint letter to Cabinet Secretary Fergus Ewing raising their concerns about the prospects for the Scottish suckler beef herd.
The number of finished cattle passing through Scottish abattoirs has declined from more than 520,000 cattle in 2005 to under 400,000 in 2017, as part of what has been a long-term trend. The major factor in this reduction has been the challenge of profitability impacting the on-going viability of beef production.
NFUS Livestock Committee chairman Charlie Adam said: "All three organisations welcome that the Scottish Government has now produced its post-Brexit proposals in the form of the "Stability and Simplicity" consultation. Importantly, that allows for a rural funding transition period and we will submit our full responses in due course.
"However, greater returns from the marketplace for beef in the future will be limited due to the fierce competitiveness of the food retail market. Our reputation for quality and our PGI (protected geographical indication) status will play a vital role in leveraging the necessary premium for Scotch Beef over our competitors, but despite that premium being in place for many years, the beef sector has still seen a substantial decline in numbers.
"Therefore, with limited market returns, it is vital that any future support for the sector is developed in a way which enhances production levels of iconic Scotch beef."
Mr. Adam went on: "The existing Scottish Suckler Beef Support Scheme has been a positive driver of on-farm productivity, encouraging some farmers to invest in the production of profitable stock. However, it has at best only slowed the decline in stock numbers rather than achieve its policy aims to stabilise beef cow numbers and then return the size of the national herd beck to historical levels."
SBA President, Neil McCorkindale added: "While the Beef Efficiency Scheme has been another avenue to deliver support to the sector, in its current form this scheme has been perceived by many producers as impractical and overly-burdensome which has restricted its potential to initiate meaningful and lasting changes on-farm. We therefore hope that the Scottish Government can commit to simplicity when developing similar future support mechanisms to make them more user friendly, attractive and, most importantly, enabling all livestock farmers to achieve productivity benefits."
SAMW President Frank Clark said: "It is obvious from discussion with farming bodies that production-driven support is needed in the immediate future to arrest the decline in cattle numbers, hopefully reversing the present downward trend in growth."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here