WHY aren’t more Scots saving and investing via ISAs? And what can be done to encourage more people to use them to prepare for their financial futures?
With tomorrow (5 August) being the fifth anniversary of AIM stocks being accepted in ISAs, we can reflect that it has never been easier for people to invest – and it can be really tax effective.
Yet amid the riot of advertisements and features, we should recognise that many people still do not save via cash ISAs, let alone investment ISAs. ONS figures show that in the last tax year some 11.1 million adults opened an ISA across the whole of the UK – not bad, but still less than one quarter of the UK adult population.
Part of this may be due to the fact that the word saving has two distinct meanings.
When your supermarket receipt tells you how much you saved in your weekly shop, it means you saved it only in the sense that you didn’t spend it. It is the benefit of savvy shopping.
Research undertaken for Barclays shows that we Scots spend more than 2,500 hours of our lifetime – the equivalent to 29 hours per year – hunting for bargains, and are on average saving up to £348 a year, leaving us around £22,000 better off over the course of our lifetime for doing so. Clearly savvy shopping pays.
That is all fine. But saving also means setting aside that money for your future needs, and we don’t seem to be doing that very well at all. The same Barclays research shows that 93 per cent of UK-wide respondents claim to know the advantages of investing, but only 9% of Scots put their money to work through investments.
It helps if you consider banking as some behavioural scientists do, not necessarily in terms of money, but also in terms of happiness.
Modern banking can help you manage your lifestyle and happiness across different stages of your life. You can borrow your potential future income to buy the house or the car you need now; you can invest some of your current income so you can have a comfortable retirement.
Looking at it this way, ISAs should be presented in terms of investing for happiness rather than money. A little gratification deferred now means more happiness in the future.
Behavioural scientists speak of present bias – saving is tough because we all prefer happiness now. But that isn’t the only bias that affects investors at this time. Even if you are investing in stocks and shares ISAs, there may still be biases to your behaviour that you can amend.
There is familiarity bias. It leads us to invest in well-known companies – household names we might know as a customer as well as an investor. It’s a dangerous bias for new investors who could end up owning shares in a single company rather than diversifying.
Then there is home bias, encouraging people to consider investing in companies or products that appear close to home. Here in Scotland, that might mean buying a FTSE 100 tracker rather than looking beyond our shores.
Luckily, this isn’t so dangerous since most Scottish and many UK blue-chip companies are international and may not conduct much trade at all in the UK. But it does mean that investors’ minds may not be open to the opportunities a more global approach may bring.
Of course, investments can fall in value no matter what strategy you adopt, but ISA providers can help overcome these biases by offering diversified ready-made investments and easy access to funds for investors.
We should be encouraged to view ISAs as a means to future happiness. By strongly visualising the end goal we want to achieve – say, going on that retirement cruise or sending a child through education – we are far more likely to overcome those biases to reduce risk and enjoy long-term benefits for the future.
Craig Jamieson is regional director at Barclays Wealth.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here