I apologise for returning to the scene of a tragedy but I drove past Prestwick Airport last weekend. Other than the old plane with no engines which they practice fire drills on there was not an aircraft in sight.
The dream of a Prestwick Spaceport seems to be over as the UK Government has followed scientific logic rather than caved in to lobbying and has designated Sutherland and Cornwall as our potential Spaceports. We don’t need another one.
A quick look at the Prestwick accounts - the latest available are for the year to 31 March 2017 - shows the impact of few passengers and planes - a loss for that year of £8.6 million and loans from you and me, via the Scottish Government, of £30.4 million - enough to employ perhaps 1,000 nurses or teachers for a year?
The red ink will not stop. Prestwick is, very sadly - because I have fond memories of it - a commercial failure. Prestwick is using scarce financial resources which could be better used to fund public services or infrastructure and is not helping the economy of the West of Scotland - it damages Glasgow Airport. Economic gravity will eventually prevail and Prestwick will close when some politician is sufficiently courageous or new in their post to do the right thing.
The real lesson of Prestwick Airport, however, is of remind us of the hubris of politicians and the capacity of Governments and their PR advisers to spin a story to the point where the narrative offered is not a downright lie but paints a picture which is at odds with the truth.
Here’s how the game works.
Each year when the disastrous accounts are released and sensible people challenge continued support for Prestwick the lines trotted out by a spokesman for the Scottish Government are the same - Prestwick Airport is a standalone company with its own management and board with a business plan which shows it can have a successful profitable future, independent accountants found that plan to be sound and all the money lent to Prestwick Airport - which the business plan shows will be repaid - is being lent at a commercial rate of interest. Each of these statements is technically true but in aggregate they present a picture so distorted that it is an insult to taxpayers and voters.
Of course Prestwick Airport has a plan which shows how it can become profitable, all companies have such a plan, Carillion and BHS would have had such plans. What matters is whether the plan is realistic or fanciful. Accountants looking at the plan can say whether it adds up, they can point to issues but they cannot say that the commercial assumptions made by the directors in the plan are rubbish, that is simply not their job.
To stop Governments propping up lame ducks with interest free loans, the EU sets parameters for the rate of interest which Governments who dish out the loans must charge and they label this a commercial rate of interest. This term is laughable, the word “commercial” is a misnomer here, a commercial rate of interest is what HSBC or RBS would charge - and such lenders are nowhere to be seen at Prestwick.
This sort of behaviour, wasting taxpayers money at a time of austerity , does not bode well for the proposed new Scottish Investment Bank. Politicians making decisions about what businesses to invest in have a truly awful track record worldwide. If the Scottish Government wants to show us it is financially responsible it should take the tough but right decision to pull the plug on Prestwick.
Pinstripe is a senior member of Scotland's financial services community.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel