NEARLY three-quarters of leaders of businesses and public sector, third sector and social enterprise organisations in Scotland believe a no-deal Brexit would trigger a UK recession.
And 87% fear the consequences of a no-deal Brexit, a survey conducted for The Herald yesterday at the Institute of Directors in Scotland’s annual conference at Gleneagles shows.
Of those surveyed, 30% said they thought there would be a no-deal Brexit.
Asked if they believed a no-deal Brexit would cause the UK economy to fall into recession, 74% of leaders said “yes”. And 85% think Brexit, under whatever scenario, will exacerbate skills shortages.
David Watt, executive director of the Institute of Directors in Scotland, said: “While the business community is hopeful for a deal, they certainly fear the effects should a no-deal come to fruition, and there is feeling that there is real danger of a recession hitting as a result.”
Mulling the broad ramifications of Brexit, Mr Watt said: “While we are all too aware that there may be economic repercussions, there are also other realities which we might face. Scotland benefits greatly from EU protection. Scotch Whisky, Stornoway Black Pudding and Arbroath Smokies – all protected and steeped in Scottish tradition. If a no-deal hits, much of that provenance could be lost.
“Equally, other benefits that have been enjoyed in Scotland such as research funding could vanish just as quickly. EU research funding generates more than 19,000 jobs across the UK…The consequence of a no-deal and funding being lost will be catastrophic.”
Credit ratings agency Standard & Poor’s has this week forecast a no-deal Brexit would send the UK into a recession lasting more than a year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel