BOWLEVEN has suffered a reverse after shareholders voted heavily against three key resolutions at the annual general meeting of the company, which moved its headquarters from Edinburgh to London following a boardroom coup.
The Cameroon-focused oil and gas company revealed that around 90 per cent of votes cast at Wednesday’s AGM opposed resolutions four to six, which directors had unanimously recommended shareholders support.
The defeats appear to limit the company’s freedom of manoeuvre.
If passed, resolution four would have renewed directors’ authority to allot shares in the firm, including through a rights issue.
The fifth resolution would have disapplied the rights of existing investors to be offered shares first.
Resolution six concerned the company’s authority to make off market purchases of its shares.
In the notice of the AGM included in the annual report Bowlen published last month, the company said: “The Directors consider that the resolutions to be proposed at the AGM are in the best interests of the Company and shareholders as a whole.
“Accordingly, the Directors unanimously recommend that you vote in favour of the resolutions to be proposed at the AGM, as the Directors intend to do in respect of their own beneficial shareholdings.”
Former Bowleven chief executive Kevin Hart was voted off the board along with four other directors in March last year after a campaign for change led by the Crown Ocean Capital investment firm.
Eli Chahin, a veteran of the banking and management consulting industries became chief executive.
Crown Ocean Capital was founded by German financiers Christian Petersmann and Konstantin Stoyanov.
Regulatory filings show the Crown Ocean Capital P1 venture has a 29.03% interest in voting rights in Bowleven shares.
Other resolutions at the latest general meeting were passed.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here