Next is expected to report a drop in full-year profits this week as the high street remains under extreme pressure from a consumer spending slowdown.
A consensus of City analysts are pencilling in an 8% fall in annual pre-tax profits to £725 million and the figures will come at a time of growing concern for brick-and-mortar retailers.
As well as the administrations of Toys R Us and Maplin, Debenhams, Mothercare and Carpetright have all issued profit warnings this year.
To compound matters, a spate of firms including Jamie's Italian, burger chain Byron and Prezzo have shut hundreds of stores as consumer confidence dives in the face of Brexit-fuelled inflation.
Next has not been immune from the malaise, but the clothing chain posted a surprise rise in sales over Christmas and upgraded its profit forecast.
Next said full-price sales in the 54 days to December 24 increased 1.5%, ahead of expectations, with part of the improvement down to much colder weather leading up to Christmas.
As a result, Next upped its full-year profit guidance by £8 million to £725 million, although the figure is still a long way off last year's £790.2 million.
Sales at its high street outlets declined 6.1% and George Salmon, equity analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: "Next's Christmas trading update showed high street sales continuing to suffer.
"That's a trend that looks set to continue, but the outlook for next year has improved."
Next chief executive Lord Simon Wolfson, a prominent Leave supporter, has previously said that Next will look to reduce costs by renegotiating rents with landlords and controlling wages and man hours.
He also said that inflationary pressure will ease throughout 2018.
Mr Salmon added: "The group expects sales growth to firm up as online continues to deliver good results.
"Meanwhile, cost inflation is expected to ease, and then disappear, over the course of 2018.
"All that bodes well - higher sales and higher margins mean doubly higher profits in the longer term.
"However, retail still accounts for a huge slice of sales, and with conditions remaining tough, it's likely to be far from plain sailing."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here