INVESTORS have told the boss of Royal Bank of Scotland that the sale of the UK Government’s majority stake is the single most important milestone which must be reached before they would consider upping their investment in the institution, once it reaches a settlement in the US over its mis-selling of toxic mortgages.
The message was delivered to chief executive Ross McEwan at the Morgan Stanley Financials Conference in London, as he underlined the bank’s hopes of reaching a settlement with the US Department of Justice (DoJ) this year.
Mr McEwan said the settlement, which analysts expect will cost the bank several billion pounds, is the last major legacy issue to be overcome before the institution can resume dividend payments and return capital to investors via a share buyback. He had hoped a settlement would have been reached before the end of last year.
Conference delegates were given five scenarios and asked what they regarded to be the most important in terms of upping their investments in the bank, once the US settlement is out of the way. The five factors were: maintaining share wins in mortgage and SME lending; achieving a 50 per cent cost income ratio target in 2020; normalisation of its dividend policy; capital generation and share buy-back; and the road map to the exit of the Government stake. The final option received the most votes, but Mr McEwan said a sell-off will be “problematic” until the bank settles with the DoJ. Asked whether an agreement was “near”, he said: “I’ve got the timing of this completely wrong for the last 15 months, so I’m not going to predict it. All I’d say is that it will hopefully be in 2018.” He added: “That is the thing between us and returning capital.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here