THE Bank of England may never be able to regain the trust it lost during the financial crisis, its chief economist has admitted.
Andy Haldane - who also sits on the Bank's interest rate-setting Monetary Policy Committee - said the 2008 financial crisis was "hugely trust-busting" for those involved in money and finance, including the Bank of England.
"Even as the scars of the crisis heal, this trust deficit might not repair itself naturally," he said during a question and answer panel hosted by the Royal Society of Arts in London.
"In other words, the trust deficit that those in money and finance face may be not cyclical, not temporary, but structural and permanent.
"And if that's true, and it strikes me as plausible - more than plausible - then those of us within financial services, including central banks, will have to really go some to repair that deficit."
Bank of England policymakers have been making efforts to engage with a wider UK audience in recent months as part of a bid to regain public confidence, in light of the fact that the financial sector has "historically done a very poor job" of explaining what it does and who it exists to serve, Mr Haldane said.
However, the chief economist said institutions such as the Bank of England were still in some cases justified in keeping some information from the public.
"It is not always in every way the case that greater openness and transparency are a good thing," Mr Haldane said.
"Had we been fully open and fully transparent about what was going on during the financial crisis, it would, let me tell you, have been a lot lot worse.
"That would have been shouting fire in the theatre and however bad it was, it would have caused... an even greater haemorrhaging in confidence, and even greater collateral damage for savers and borrowers than we even saw."
But at its core, money and finance is about promises built on "nothing more and nothing less than trust", he stressed.
"When that trust goes south, money and finance collapses. In some ways, the loss of trust is the very definition of a financial crisis, the likes of which we've seen for at least eight centuries and counting."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here