CHAMPIONS of the National Living Wage may feel the 30p increase in the standard hourly rate to £7.50 from April could be justified on economic and social policy grounds.
It put more money into the hands of lower paid workers, who are more likely to spend any additional income they get than better off types.
As Bank of England governor Mark Carney noted yesterday that uncertainty about Brexit had made many firms reluctant to give big pay rises, the resulting boost to demand may have been especially valuable.
But research findings published today on the impact of the increase on the key small business sector point to potentially damaging effects.
The survey by the Federation of Small Businesses suggests the rise has posed big challenges for small firms, which are less able to cope with cost increases than bigger fish.
It may have had a harmful effect on employment by prompting some small firms to shed staff and making others less inclined to recruit workers.
Small and medium sized enterprises account for a bigger share of private sector employment than large ones.
As a fifth of respondents to the FSB survey had reduced staff hours the four per cent increase in the hourly rate may not have been accompanied by a matching rise in many workers’ pay packets.
Many firms have cut investment since the rate change, reducing demand for goods and services provided by others and potentially impacting on their own growth.
Some may feel that if we want to keep increasing the living wage small firms should be compensated in some way.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel