PREMIER Oil’s enthusiasm for the giant Catcher development it brought into production south-east of Aberdeen recently reflects the success of a project that has provided a big boost for the North Sea oil and gas industry.
While many firms have slashed investment in the area amid the sharp fall in the crude price since 2014, Premier expects to make lots of money on the output from Catcher.
Crude is only selling for around $64 per barrel, compared with $115/bbl when Premier and its partner Cairn Energy decided in 2014 to proceed with Catcher.
But Premier chief executive Tony Durrant notes the costs of operating North Sea fields has fallen to around $20 per barrel from $35/bbl plus in recent years. Catcher is set to cost 30% less than expected, at $1.6 billion.
Premier has also reaped the rewards for its decision to buy a big portfolio of North Sea assets from E.ON for $120m in 2016, in time to benefit from the partial recovery in the crude price from a low of less than $30 in the first quarter of that year.
The mature assets in the portfolio have performed well.
It is encouraging that Premier seems keen to go ahead with the Tolmount project, on which it expects to generate good returns even at low gas prices.
However, the continued underperformance of Premier’s flagship Solan field West of Shetland is a source of concern.
Solan lies in a relatively under-explored area which is attracting attention from the majors, encouraging hopes there could be a bonanza in the future.
But Premier produced an average 5,900 barrels oil equivalent per day last year from Solan, which had been expected to be producing 20,000 boepd plus by the end of 2016.
Its experience shows the challenges involved working in an area where there is little production infrastructure in place compared with other parts of the North Sea
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here