With the party season well and truly upon us, it’s more than likely that you’ll need to buy a bottle or two of Champagne over the coming weeks. Fizz sales spike in December, and while Prosecco and Cava see an increase, it’s still Champagne that leads the festive charge.
The region of Champagne lies to the north east of Paris where almost 20,000 vignerons nurture the Pinot noir, Pinot Meunier and Chardonnay required to make this fizzy elixir. The two red grapes provide structure, fruit and oomph (a technical wine term) while the Chardonnay brings elegance and finesse to the party.
When picking your bottle, you’ll have to decide whether to go for a non-vintage, a vintage (from a single year) or a deluxe (or prestige) cuvee. The non-vintage release is the Champagne house’s bread and butter. It tends to be a blend of three or four different years (hence, non-vintage) and is made in a consistent style.
The vintage wines are a snapshot of a particular year when the quality and abundance of the grapes has been good. The house needs the abundance as well as the quality, as they have to have enough of a yield to contribute to the non-vintage release as well.
The prestige cuvées are the top (and most expensive) releases, normally also from a single vintage. Think Moet’s Dom Pérignon, Roederer’s Cristal and Taittinger’s Comtes de Champagne.
One of my favourite producers is Laurent-Perrier. Established in 1812, they are now the fifth biggest house in Champagne making seven million bottles per year. The quality across the range is unquestionable, with the Grand Siécle (Inverarity One to One, £130) being the very pinnacle of their production. Unlike most prestige cuvées, it’s a blend of grapes from three perfect years designed to combine finesse, power and balance. It’s cellared for eight years before release, and it is just a beautiful Champagne.
For a more affordable option, pop in to your local wine merchant and ask them about their house Champagne. They’ll happily recommend something in the £20-£25 range which should tick most of your boxes over the festive season. Cheers!
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here