What is it?
The latest update to Apple’s mobile phone product line. Interestingly, the usual fanfare that surrounds Apple releases has been noticeably reduced with the iPhone 7.
This is mainly due to the lack of new game-changing features such as the slick biometric login of the previous model which won widespread plaudits.
The evolution this time is more subtle and includes the removal of the headphone jack and the addition of some minor waterproofing to the case.
The missing sound port gives a slight boost in battery life but that's about the extent of changes compared to the existing iPhone 6S.
Good points?
The same high-quality hardware you expect from Apple is present with some minor upgrades. The camera is now 12 megapixels compared to the 8MP of the iPhone 6 and the screen has been made a bit brighter with richer colours.
The decision to remove the trusty headphone jack has allowed the casing to become waterproof and means the phone has a larger battery than its predecessor.
Although not cheap, wireless ear-pods mean you no longer have to concern yourself with cables flapping and catching on zips and furniture.
Bad points?
The lack of genuine innovation is a disappointment and the increased battery life is barely noticeable.
Best for ...
Apple die-hards who crave the shiny new products as soon as they are released.
Avoid if ...
You are an iPhone 6 user as there is not much difference to the functionality on offer.
Score
9/10.
Apple iPhone 7, £599 (apple.com)
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here