What is it?
A pair of stylish wireless headphones.
Urbanista has taken a different approach to audio design with the outer ear-panel acting as a touch-sensitive controller.
Their Seattle headphones utilise this technology to minimise fumbling for cable buttons or remembering press combinations when wishing to skip and pause tracks.
Good Points?
A lack of visual features does not dampen interest to look at the Seattle headphones. The minimalist design could have been invented in a military aviation centre to evade radar: there are no jutting buttons, only clean lines that draw admirers in.
Sound output is sharp without compromising bass and lends itself well to most genres even at higher volumes.
The touch-pad on the right headphone plate works really well and should see the concept copied by other manufacturers soon. The swiping motions used to change the volume, skip and pause songs are intuitive and add pleasure to what can be a frustrating aspect of the wireless music listening experience in general.
Stability of the Bluetooth connection was also excellent with no lag or drop-outs in music playback.
Bad points?
Avid technology followers will point to a lack of alternative wireless communication methods such as NFC (near field communication) and compression codecs such as aptX, but players that support this are still thin on the ground.
Best for ...
Anyone looking for a solid, well-made pair of headphones that offer a great user experience and high quality sound.
Avoid if ...
You are seeking a top of the market device with active noise-cancelling attributes and price to match.
Score: 8/10.
Urbanista Seattle Wireless Headphones, £99 (uk.urbanista.com)
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here