REBECCA McQuillan’s article ("Why as a republican, I am glad we still have a monarchy" The Herald, November 30), is, essentially, an argument against democracy. Let us deny the people the right to choose because they might make the wrong choice.

Consider this scenario: you have a serious brain injury and are due to be operated on by the world's most eminent surgeon. He dies the day before your operation. Who would you want to fill his place? The next most eminent surgeon available or your first choice's eldest son, who might just happen to be a philandering, tax avoiding, imbecile?

The point with a monarchy, and all inherited privilege, is you have no choice.

Scott Rorison,

161 High Street,

Dumbarton.

IN the end, and despite certain reservations, Rebecca McQuillan’s argument in favour of the monarchy gives much food for positive thought.

In my view, the institution remains the best asset we have in this country – for all manner of tried and tested reasons, but, principally, the distinct separation of state and government.

As for its future popularity under Prince Charles, hopefully the same basic constitutional function will prevail; this country would be very much the poorer without it.

Brian D Henderson,

44 Dundrennan Road, Battlefield, Glasgow.