Theresa May has played down a row over the Daily Mail's front page picture of her and Nicola Sturgeon focusing on their legs.
The Prime Minister said she did not mind if "people want to have a bit of fun" about how she was dressed.
The national newspaper faced accusations of sexism after publishing a front page picture of the Prime Minister and Scottish First Minister under the headline "Who won Legs-it!".
The Mail was condemned as "moronic" and accused of deterring girls from entering politics over its coverage of Monday's meeting between the two women.
But the newspaper's columnist Sarah Vine accused critics of having a "sense of humour failure", while a Daily Mail spokesman hit out at its "po-faced" detractors.
And Mrs May told Wolverhampton's Express and Star: "If people want to have a bit of fun about how we dress, then so be it."
Mrs May told the Express and Star: "You will notice that I am wearing trousers today!
"As a woman in politics throughout my whole career I have found that very often, what I wear - particularly my shoes - has been an issue that has been looked at rather closely by people.
"Obviously what we do as politicians is what makes a difference to people's lives. I think that most people concentrate on what we do as politicians.
"But if people want to have a bit of fun about how we dress, then so be it."
The Mail's front page carried a photograph of the two women sitting down for talks in Glasgow under the headline "Never mind Brexit, who won Legs-it!".
In later editions the headline was accompanied by a trail for an inside page article by Ms Vine - the wife of Conservative former cabinet minister Michael Gove - discussing their appearance.
A spokesman for the First Minister said: "It is slightly surprising that when the First Minister of Scotland and the Prime Minister of the UK meet to discuss the key issues of the UK's departure from the EU and giving the people of Scotland a choice over their future that the main focus should be on their legs and what they are wearing.
"Brexit may risk taking Britain back to the early 1970s but there is no need for coverage of events to lead the way."
But Ms Vine said: "I think that people have maybe have had a slight sense of humour failure."
She told BBC Radio 4's World at One: "A lot of the kerfuffle around this, if I may say so, is to do with the fact that this is a piece in the Daily Mail.
"If Private Eye were to run this picture on the cover of their magazine next week and put a similar headline, nobody would bat an eyelid.
"It's just because it's in the Daily Mail and people have a Pavlovian reaction to the Daily Mail."
A spokesman for the newspaper said Ms Vine's piece was a sidebar alongside the serious political coverage and added: "For the record, the Mail was the paper which, more than any other, backed Theresa May for the top job.
"Again for the record, we often comment on the appearance of male politicians including Cameron's waistline, Osborne's hair, Corbyn's clothes - and even Boris's legs.
"Is there a rule that says political coverage must be dull or has a po-faced BBC and left-wing commentariat, so obsessed by the Daily Mail, lost all sense of humour... and proportion?"
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said: "It's 2017. This sexism must be consigned to history. Shame on the Daily Mail," while the party's former deputy leader Harriet Harman said it was "moronic".
London mayor Sadiq Khan, on an official visit to Brussels, said it would only serve to put off girls and young women from entering politics.
He said: "What sort of message does that send to girls, young women, thinking about starting a career in politics if we are talking about their legs rather than their views on important matters?"
Amelia Womack, the Green Party's deputy leader, has submitted a formal complaint to the Independent Press Standards Organisation (Ipso) over the "Legs-it" headline, claiming it discriminated against the women because of their gender.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel