Bashar-al Assad, the Syrian President, has insisted that the reports of a chemical attack by his country's forces on its own people were a "100 per cent fabrication".
In an interview with Agence France-Presse[AFP], he said: "There was no order to make any attack".
Western countries, including the US and UK, have claimed there is incontrovertible proof that Assad's forces were behind the attack; Donald Trump, the US President, has branded the Syrian leader an "animal" and a "truly evil person".
However, Russia has argued there is simply no proof of an attack ordered by Assad and suggested it was carried out by rebel forces, seeking to draw America into the conflict. Vladimir Putin has likened Washington and London's allegations of a chemical weapons attack to those now-discredited claims that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.
This week, Russia blocked a draft resolution backed by America, Britain and France to denounce the attack in the rebel-held town of Khan Sheikhoun and to tell Assad's regime to provide access for investigators and information such as flight plans.
Last week, more than 80 people were killed and hundreds suffered symptoms consistent with a nerve agent. Tests have since suggested lethal sarin gas was used.
Mr Assad told AFP that his government had given up its arsenal of chemical weapons four years ago. He stressed: "Even if we have them, we wouldn't use them."
He accused the West of making up the claim to enable it to carry out the retaliatory air strikes on a Syrian government airbase.
"It's stage one - the play we saw on social network and TVs - then propaganda and then stage two - the military attack," said Assad.
Speaking from his office in Damascus, he claimed Washington was "not serious" about ending the conflict, saying: "They want to use it as an umbrella for the terrorists."
The Syrian President made clear he would only allow an "impartial" investigation into the strike at Khan Sheikhoun to make sure it was not used for "politicised purposes".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel