ONE of the country’s smallest authorities, Inverclyde’s only option for a majority-run council lies with the SNP, with Labour fielding just enough to form a coalition.
Run by Labour since 2007 and fronted by the combative Stephen McCabe, the SNP believes it is within touching distance of local power for the first time.
The area spans the south shores of the Firth of Clyde from Port Glasgow to the Wemyss Bay ferry terminal, taking in Greenock, Gourock and the affluent Kilmacolm.
The SNP, headed by deputy leadership contender Chris McEleny, will put up 12 candidates, one more than the required number for a majority, while Labour will field just nine.
The area faces issues of depopulation, with concerns over the impact on services at Inverclyde Royal Hospital, but while national issues are dominating the doorstep discussion, support for the odd popular local Independent, of whom 10 are standing, could be crucial – as could social media.
Mr McCabe, observers claim, has, on top of the SNP and Tories in his ward, a battle against a Port Glasgow school janitor to contend with.
Mr McEleny has the Independent Ronnie Ahlfeld, who secured the highest percentage of first preference votes in 2012, as one of his challengers in Gourock. An independence-supporting Labour candidate is also standing in Inverclyde, along with a community activist successfully sued by former Rangers chairman Sandy Easdale for defamation.
One source said: “Stephen McCabe faces a tough battle to get back in and has told some people he won’t be back. But that’s likely a bit of gamesmanship.
“He’s certainly recognisable across the authority, both in the local media and on social media.
“People who follow local politics will recognise his regular rows with Chris McEleny and you can be sure many in Labour and the SNP wish the pair would put the smart- phones down.
“On paper, May 4 says SNP. But if they don’t get the majority then the others would probably be more prepared to do a deal with Labour.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here