WEST Lothian’s power struggles have historically hinged on single issue campaigners but the floor is now open with a controversial SNP candidate criticised for her “quisling” comments vying with seasoned Labour politicians.
SNP candidate Moira Shemilt, reported to have called one pro-Union supporter a “quisling” the day after the 2014 independence referendum, is challenging for Livingston South, while council leader John McGinty is standing in Bathgate.
The SNP’s William Hannah Boyle, Barry Burrows and Lisa McArthur join Labour’s Harry Cartmill and Mr McGinty, Conservative Charles Kennedy, Dale McDowell of the Scottish Green Party, Fiona Ann Stevens, of the Scottish Liberal Democrats and independent Jim Walker for the Bathgate seat.
The SNP have 23 candidates, Labour 16, Tories and Lib Dems nine each and Greens eight. There is one Ukip candidate, two independents and one Scottish Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition candidate.
Previous power shifts have hinged on one issue and campaigners bidding to save health services at one stage helped the SNP wrest the rule from Labour.
In the 2012 result there were 16 Labour, 15 SNP, one Conservative and one independent led to Labour taking power with the support of the Tory and independent councillors.
But that administration replaced the previous SNP minority council which had been supported by a Conservative councillor and Action to Save St John’s Hospital group councillors since 2007.
A decade ago Labour came out the biggest party with 14 seats to the Nationalists’ 13 but the SNP formed a coalition with the three councillors elected under the hospital campaign banner and a Tory, before the Action to Save St John’s group all lost their seats five years ago. The administration has grown from 32 members to 33.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel