How nauseatingly self-important was the quote from Professor Adam Tomkins MSP who opined: “I’m not sure I would come here [to Scotland] now, partly for economic and partly for political reasons” (From left-wing firebrand republican to Ruth Davidson’s brain: Meet Tory MSP Professor Adam Tomkins, People behind the power, May 14). Yet he has deigned to grace us with his presence in our Parliament, at our expense.
Referring to the Scottish Government’s freeze on the 40p income tax band, he asks: “Why would I do the same work in Glasgow, rather than Oxford, if I was going to be taxed more for it?” It seems he overlooks the facts that the NHS in Scotland, is miles better than its counterpart in England. We have free prescription charges and we pay no university tuition fees – pretty good value for a very small difference in tax payable only by the relatively wealthy. If he finds Scotland so little to his taste, perhaps he might like to go back to Oxford from whence he came.
Roy Pedersen
We are expected to believe that Adam Tomkins went from being a republican, and presumably an egalitarian, to joining a party whose policies are in favour of the accumulation and retention of wealth for the richest, while exhibiting callous indifference to the weak and marginalised. Why join a political party he professes he didn’t believe in? Because Ruth Davidson bent her ear to his alleged expertise.
He would not have chosen to live in Glasgow because of “politics”. The same “politics” has encouraged him to join a party which landed the UK with separation from the EU, the world’s largest tariff-free trading block, instigating economic fear, social division, violence against minorities and a political leadership wallowing in xenophobia and nostalgia for an imaginary past involving the Commonwealth: the self same Commonwealth whose citizens flitting to the UK, caused Enoch Powell and his ilk to wallow in the same poisonous shoals which reflect Brexit.
GR Weir
Ochiltree
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel