FORMER RBS executive Fred Goodwin could still give evidence in a trial related to the near-collapse of Royal Bank of Scotland, it is claimed.
A meeting between Ross McEwan, RBS's chief executive, and directors of the RBS Shareholder Action Group on Friday moved to reach a settlement between the two sides, Sky News reported.
Insiders said that the talks, which took place at RBS's London offices, concluded without an agreement after Mr McEwan declined to increase a financial offer to the remaining claimants.
The action group, which indicated at the beginning of the week that a majority of its 9,000 members had backed an 82p-a-share deal, is now scrambling to raise £7m to fund itself through the anticipated 14-week trial - which is due to kick off in five days' time.
Sources said it had raised roughly £4m so far from unidentified contributors.
RBS had hoped that at least 70 per cent of the claimants by value would accept the settlement, which would have made it binding upon all of the participants.
It was unclear exactly what proportion of the claimants by value had indicated their willingness to accept, with the trial due to begin next Wednesday.
The judge in the case has already adjourned it three times amid ongoing settlement talks.
While an 82p-a-share deal with the outstanding claimants would have cost RBS more than £200m, some observers believe the bank should have offered a higher sum in order to draw a line under the case.
If the trial does go ahead, it would be among the most keenly awaited events to follow on from Britain's banking crisis of 2008, with former RBS boss Mr Goodwin expected to spend two days in the witness box.
Mr Goodwin, who was ousted as RBS's boss as it was being bailed out with £45bn of taxpayers' money in 2008, has never given a full public account of the crisis at the bank.
Earlier that year, he oversaw a £12bn rights issue aimed at shoring up the bank's balance sheet - a fundraising that investors claim was based on misleading information.
Many of the former shareholders, some of whom rank among RBS's current workforce, have accepted an 82p-a-share offer made last month, while a number of other claimant groups had settled for just over 40p-a-share.
Others, however, are determined to see Mr Goodwin and his former senior colleagues appear in court.
Mr Goodwin, along with Sir Tom McKillop, the former RBS chairman, are named alongside the state-backed bank as defendants in the case.
The Government continues to own more than 70% of the bank, and there is little prospect of it ever recouping the money it paid to avert its outright collapse.
To date, more than £100m has been spent by the bank defending the claims, a bill which includes the legal costs of Mr Goodwin and other former directors.
Those legal fees have drawn criticism from investors and politicians, but were defended by Sir Howard Davies, RBS's chairman, at its annual meeting earlier this month.
Sir Vince Cable, who was business secretary in the 2010-15 coalition government, described the legal bill as "obscene".
RBS and a spokesman for the action group declined to comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel