MY only surprise about the election is that so many people who should know better are so surprised that the outcome seems so distorted. Rebecca McQuillan deserves full marks for being the only commentator I have seen to highlight the role of our electoral system (“A voting system that is past its sell-by date”, The Herald, June 10). In summary, her column says “it's the electoral system, stupid”.

However, the implication in her article, that a change to any so-called “proportional representation” system will do, needs a whole lot of qualification. She notes that “British voters rejected electoral reform in 2010”. They didn't. What they rejected was the Alternative Vote system in one-member constituencies, which is no more “proportional” than first past the post. You can't represent different views with a system that elects only one person at a time and British voters were given no other option in the referendum.

She also states that the Holyrood and local authority election systems “improve proportionality while retaining a constituency link”. Correct. But nobody seems to notice that 57 per cent of the members at Holyrood are still elected by first past the post. The remainder are elected in seven-member seats, which makes it very difficult in my experience to establish links with Regional List members.

The single transferable vote (STV) system, used for local authorities in Scotland, does retain a personal link to all elected members, in that you are far more likely to have voted for one of them. However, the artificial restriction to either three or four members per constituency reduces the party proportionality of the outcome and increases “wasted” votes. As Ms McQuillan says, the SNP, Liberal Democrats and Greens all support electoral reform (in fact STV). As they have a majority in the Scottish Parliament, I don't know why they don't just go ahead and implement proper STV for Holyrood and local authority elections.

Thomas G F Gray,

4A Auchinloch Road, Lenzie.

REBECCA McQuillan alludes to the first past the post electoral system as being "absurd and undemocratic”. I do not see anything absurd in the candidate who polls the most votes being elected as the democratic choice of their particular constituency. What I do consider absurd are the number of "no chance aspirants" who stand for election and inevitably forfeit their £500 deposit in the process.

At least first past the post is a simple system clearly understandable to the voter as opposed to the elaborate single transferable vote process previously thrust on the electorate in Scottish local elections.

Allan C Steele,

22 Forres Avenue, Giffnock.

We boast about our age-old democratic system and that the will of the people dictates our collective future but nothing could be further from the truth. The latest General Election clearly demonstrates that in a multi-party system in the absence of co-operation between fellow-travellers that popular opinion cannot prevail over the interests of a well-organised minority group.

The UK population is 65 million-plus, of which 46,843,705 are registered to vote and the recent turnout was 68.7per cent. The Apathy Party secured 31.3 per cent of possible votes, which is greater than the winning Conservative Party achieved with its 13,667,231. Less than one-third of the electorate and barely one-fifth of the inhabitants of this sceptred isle voted for the party whic will now, after a bit of horse-trading with the only party which will listen to their bribes, get another shot at clobbering the poor. The UK GDP will continue to be taxed at a rate substantially less than the average of our European competitors forcing government to continue to borrow and to justify its austerity policy which can only accelerate the collapse of our service-based economy.

Please explain to me what is democratic about a system of governance that actively facilitates a well-funded minority group enforcing its will against the wishes of the majority. Democracy, government of the people by the people? A wiser man than me once said “If democracy worked they wouldn’t let us have it”.

David J Crawford,

Flat 3/3 131 Shuna Street, Glasgow.