COUNCILS have been warned about the dangers of overtesting pupils.
Government officials said the new standardised assessments should replace existing testing regimes and not be seen as an add-on.
Earlier this year it emerged that nearly one-third of councils are continuing with their own assessments in addition to the new proposals.
A survey found at least nine local authorities are intending to run different tests at the same time – at least for one year.
Liz Smith, education spokeswoman for the Scottish Conservative Party, said the point of the tests was to ensure common standards across the country. She said: “It will create both a great deal of confusion, as well as an added workload for teachers if there are wide variations of testing across local authorities.”
Iain Gray, education spokesman for the Scottish Labour Party, added: The Government’s national assessment policy has been a shambles from the beginning.
“It is no wonder that only eight councils Scottish councils are certain they will move over to the new national assessments.”
However, officials said it was understandable councils wanted to ensure the tests delivered what was expected, but said over-testing was a concern.
Speaking at a briefing on the new assessments a government official said: “Inevitably people were still hedging their bets because they hadn’t seen these assessments, but there is now more confidence within local authorities to make that transition. All councils are committed to doing it and to making the transition, but while some may do it immediately, some may take a year or two years and that is the prerogative of the local authorities to make that decision.”
An official from schools inspectorate Education Scotland added: “The conversations we are having with local authorities are about over-assessment.
“We wouldn’t ever want our pupils to be over-assessed.
“If we have over-assessment it is not good for teachers in terms of bureaucracy and it is not good for pupils because they wouldn’t expect that. This should be part of what is happening every day in a classroom rather than an additional burden.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here