Supermarket giant Sainsbury’s was accused of racism, after security tagging cans of £3.80 Jamaican ackee.
Facebook user Toby Taylor, 31, attracted heated debate after posting a photo of the tinned fruit at his local store in Penge, south east London, with a caption that questioned the British chain’s policy in light of other, smaller, items being left unguarded.
Nice slab of corporate racism on offer in one of your stores today Sainsbury's – I note that the the £20 bottles of…
Posted by Toby Taylor on Saturday, July 22, 2017
He said: “Nice slab of corporate racism on offer in one of your stores today Sainsbury’s – I note that the the £20 bottles of truffle oil (that were significantly smaller may I add) had no tags whatsoever.
“Can you clarify your tagging policy for me? that would be great.”
Toby’s photo attracted widespread attention on social media, with many criticising his take on the decision to safeguard the cans.
Former British National Party leader Nick Griffin was one of those who commented, stating: “This is the average Labour supporter; sees racism everywhere.
Toby Taylor, who photographed the can in Penge, south east London (Toby Taylor)
“He needs to wake up & see the REAL racism in Britain, like English girls being groomed on an industrial scale in our northern towns!”
Toby said he welcomed “healthy debate” around the issue, but claimed it was hard to have a civil discussion with tempers flared and admitted the issue had “really upset people”.
A Sainsbury’s spokeswoman denied the store was engaging in discriminatory practices.
She said: “We take the decision on which products to tag on an individual store basis to protect high value or frequently stolen items.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel