UK defence chiefs have backed transgender people serving in the armed forces after President Donald Trump announced they are to be banned from the US military.
In a series of posts on Twitter, Mr Trump said he had taken the decision because US forces “cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgender in the military would entail”.
His comments were opposed by Rear Admiral Alex Burton, Commander UK Maritime Forces, who tweeted: “As a Royal Navy LGBT champion and senior warfighter I am so glad we are not going this way.”
As an @RoyalNavy_LGBT champion and senior warfighter I am so glad we are not going this way https://t.co/S8ZI4NjpfQ
— Alex Burton (@RAdmAlexBurton) July 26, 2017
He added: “We have a justifiably rigorous selection process but it doesn’t include discrimination and we’re a better fighting force for it.”
Second Sea Lord Vice Admiral Jonathan Woodcock said on Twitter he was “proud” of the Royal Navy’s transgender personnel.
“They bring diversity to our Royal Navy and I will always support their desire to serve their country,” he added.
“I suspect many who doubt the abilities of our diverse service personnel might be more reluctant to serve than they are to comment.”
So proud of our Transgender personnel. They bring #Diversity to our @RoyalNavy and I will always support their desire to serve their country https://t.co/PSLAEy6laR
— Second Sea Lord (@VAdmJWoodcock) July 26, 2017
A Ministry of Defence spokesman said it did not comment on “US military recruitment policy”.
But the spokesman added: “We are clear that all LGBT+ members of our armed forces play a vital role in keeping our nation safe.
“We will continue to welcome people from a diverse range of backgrounds, including transgender personnel.”
The MoD said it was unable to confirm how many transgender people served in the UK military.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here