Rwanda’s long-time President Paul Kagame has easily won a third term in office in a vote he had called “a formality”.
The result gives him another seven years leading the small east African nation praised for its economic performance but criticised for its silencing of opponents.
Electoral authorities overnight said Mr Kagame had won more than 98% of the vote with 80% of ballots counted, with no major change expected when final results are announced later on Saturday.
Votes are being counted in Kigali (Jerome Delay/AP/PA)
He addressed jubilant supporters at party headquarters and urged Rwandans, including those who did not support him, to work together.
“This election was criticised so much due to me continuing to be your leader, especially people from outside the country because they oppose the will of Rwandans,” he told supporters. “But Rwandans have shown that it was not manipulated by anyone but their own will.”
Mr Kagame has led the country of 12 million people since his rebels helped to end its genocide in 1994 during which more than 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus were massacred by Hutu extremists.
Paul Kagame leaves the polling station after casting his ballot (Jerome Delay/AP/PA)
The 59-year-old has been praised for the country’s economic growth, but human rights groups accuse his government of using state powers to silence opposition. Rwandan authorities, including the president, deny it.
A constitutional amendment in 2015 allows him to stay in power until 2034 if he pursues it.
Mr Kagame was running against Frank Habineza of the Democratic Green Party of Rwanda — the only permitted opposition party — and independent candidate and former journalist Philippe Mpayimana.
We voted for a sustainable and better Rwanda Today #RwandaDecides pic.twitter.com/HVPQCTlbWq
— Frank Habineza (@FrankHabineza) August 4, 2017
Three potential candidates were disqualified for allegedly failing to fulfil requirements including collecting enough signatures.
With 80% of votes counted, Mr Mpayimana had just 0.72% and conceded defeat and congratulated Mr Kagame. Mr Habineza had 0.45%.
More than 80% of Rwanda’s 6.9 million registered voters cast their ballots, according to Charles Munyaneza, executive secretary of the Rwanda Electoral Commission.
#Rwanda's Ambassador to the U.S., @AmbMukantabana, casting her vote a few moments ago. Rwandans decide with joy! #RwandaDecides ???????????????? pic.twitter.com/GCuT26LAfZ
— Mission of Rwanda UN (@RwandaUN) August 3, 2017
In Rwanda’s capital Kigali, there had been little hint of the coming vote. Candidates had been barred from putting campaign posters in most public places, including schools and hospitals.
The electoral commission vetted candidates’ campaign messages, warning that their social media accounts could be blocked otherwise.
Rwandans queue to vote in Kigali (Jerome Delay/AP/PA)
Two decades of often deadly attacks on political opponents, journalists and rights activists created a “climate of fear” ahead of Rwanda’s election, Amnesty International said in a report last month.
In 2010, Mr Kagame won with 93% of the vote.
In July, he told a campaign rally that “the day of the presidential elections will just be a formality”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here