I NOTE with your interest your front-page lead article (“Wanted: 500 teachers to fill posts in nation’s schools”, The Herald, August 15.) It’s the same story at the start of each new school year. The problem isn’t necessarily as Tavish Scott says, one of conditions and salaries, but one of the ridiculous probationary periods imposed by the General Teaching Council for Scotland (GTCS). Last year there was much talk of bringing qualified teachers from other countries to fill the gaps, an idea which would bring its own problems. One council even offered housing and relocation packages.
I am Scots and although I migrated to Australia years ago I returned to teach in Scotland. I’m a very experienced and well-qualified teacher and although I can pick up lots of supply work, there is a rigid probationary period to fulfil before I can apply for permanent positions. This makes it difficult for me to find a house, which restricts where I can look for work – supply work isn’t stable enough.
I have a vast range of experience and skills to give any school – as every school recognises when I do supply work, but that experience is not taken into account by the GTCS. So, I am restricted to supply work for the time being. I am a primary, ESL, Special Needs and secondary English teacher, and a trained journalist.
This so-called gap could be partly filled if people like myself were given consideration. Admittedly there should probably be some kind of transition training because there is a cultural and curriculum requirement to meet, but to block teachers like myself suggests the gap is a fallacy perpetuated by the media or the GTCS are living in the dark ages.
For Mr Scott’s benefit, Scottish conditions and salaries are very favourable compared to other countries.
Delia Forrest,
10 Chapletone Mains, Seamill, Ayrshire.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel