NICOLA Sturgeon has denounced as “morally bankrupt” the leaked UK Government proposals to force a post-Brexit cut in the number of low-skilled migrants to Britain.
The First Minister warned the "dreadful" policy could see families broken up while restrictions on people coming into the UK would be economically "devastating" for Scotland, which has relied on immigrants to boost its population.
Downing Street declined to comment on the leaked 82-page paper and Theresa May did not refer to it directly during Prime Minister’s Questions.
However, she did suggest that she supported a major reduction in unskilled EU migrants, telling MPs that, overall, immigration had been good for Britain but that people wanted it brought down to sustainable levels, “particularly given the impact it has on people at the lower end of the income scale in depressing their wages”.
It is understood that the document - marked ''official sensitive'' and dated this month - is one of several draft versions of a forthcoming White Paper, which has been circulated among senior officials and politicians but has not been agreed by ministers.
The paper states: ''The Government will take a view on the economic and social needs of the country as regards EU migration, rather than leaving this decision entirely to those wishing to come here and employers.”
This could involve requiring EU nationals to seek permission before taking up a job, making employers recruit locally first or restrict access to lower-skilled occupations which are not experiencing staffing shortages, the document suggests.
Among proposals floated to cut numbers of lower-skilled migrants are a restriction to two years' residency, compared with work permits for a longer period of three to five years for those in high-skilled occupations.
Ms Sturgeon said: "The proposals in this paper are morally bankrupt, they seem to ignore the fact we're dealing with human beings. These proposals would lead to family break-up in some cases.
"But secondly they would be devastating for the Scottish economy. We need to be able to attract the best and the brightest from around the world to Scotland, we've got a demographic challenge we must meet if we are to continue to grow our economy.
"So these proposals are dreadful and they are just a sign of the fact that this UK Government has completely lost the plot and completely lost sight of what they should be doing to secure a brighter future for the country," she added.
Labour’s Sadiq Khan, the London Mayor, was equally critical, calling the draft paper "an example of an extreme hard Brexit and a blueprint for strangling the London economy".
Meanwhile, Sir Vince Cable, the Liberal Democrat leader who served alongside Mrs May in the Coalition Government, claimed there had been nine studies on migration, which took in all the academic evidence and which showed immigration “had very little impact on wages or employment”.
The former Business Secretary said: “But this was suppressed by the Home Office under Theresa May because the results were inconvenient.”
In a separate development, Peter Grant, the SNP’s Europe spokesman, insisted it was “vital that the devolved administrations are properly represented at the centre of these negotiations,” pointing out how there had not been a meeting of the intergovernmental Joint Ministerial Committee for seven months.
Whitehall sources have made clear Damian Green, the First Secretary of State, is looking to hold another JMC in October.
Other developments included:
*EU sources said Brussels would block a transitional deal and impose real limits to single market access if the UK pressed ahead with the leaked immigration plans;
*Ian Blackford, the SNP leader at Westminster, called on Mrs May to "stop dancing to tune of her right wing backbenchers" and apologise for the "disgraceful" treatment her Government had shown migrants;
*a group representing some three million EU nationals in the UK said the draft proposals would add to the current "hostile environment" in Britain for EU citizens and
*the British Hospitality Association said the proposals would be "catastrophic" for the hospitality industry.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel