Chancellor Philip Hammond has dismissed claims that he offered his backing to Boris Johnson for a leadership bid as the disastrous Tory election results rolled in.
Mr Hammond said reports that he texted the Foreign Secretary at 4am on the morning after polling day in June to express support for Mr Johnson when it looked as if Prime Minister Theresa May might have to resign were not true.
According to the claims, any leadership deal with Mr Johnson would have seen the Chancellor remain in the Treasury.
Mr Hammond told the Mail on Sunday: "I do not recognise the words, or indeed the sentiment, that I saw written in the Sunday Times.
"When you read the article carefully, it didn't say, 'The text said 100% behind you'. Instead, it reads, 'Boris said I've had a text from Phil Hammond - he's 100% behind me' - not quoting me, but interpreting me."
Mr Hammond said it would not be in his nature to behave like that.
"It's completely against my character to write down anything like that. I do not write people texts of that description."
The Chancellor said that Tory election plans to reform social care funding which became dubbed the "dementia tax" were a mistake.
He said: "To drop something like that into a manifesto, launched without any sort of preparation of public opinion, was a mistake."
Mr Hammond added that Mrs May had adopted a better way of governing since the election.
He said: "She has changed the way she operates her office, is more accessible to colleagues, more engaged - an altogether better way of doing government."
Meanwhile, the Sunday Times reported that aides were so concerned about Mrs May's welfare in the aftermath of losing her Commons majority and the controversy surrounding her handling of the Grenfell disaster, that one official suggested bringing in an SAS soldier to give her a pep talk.
The newspaper also said that delays in getting a Queen's Speech ready due to negotiations with the DUP led to tensions between Downing Street and Buckingham Palace.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel