Pressure is growing within Germany’s Social Democratic Party to at least discuss the possibility of forming a new government with Chancellor Angela Merkel’s conservatives.
SPD leader Martin Schulz ruled out returning to the current “grand coalition” with Mrs Merkel after leading his party to a disastrous result in September’s election, but appeared to soften his stance before a meeting on Thursday with President Frank-Walter Steinmeier, who has urged politicians to compromise.
“The SPD is fully aware of its responsibility in the current difficult situation,” Mr Schulz told German news agency dpa. “I’m sure we will find a good solution for our country in the coming days and weeks.”
Mrs Merkel’s failure to reach a deal with the environmentalist Greens and the pro-business Free Democrats after four weeks of talks put all of Germany’s mainstream parties on the spot. If no one budges, the options are a minority government – never previously tried – or a new election.
Several Social Democrats, while expressing scepticism, have suggested their party should discuss another coalition with Mrs Merkel or support for a minority government led by her.
“If absolutely nothing else works, we must again consider a grand coalition,” SPD MP Karl Lauterbach told public broadcaster ZDF.
The party’s deputy leader, Thorsten Schaefer-Guembel, said the Social Democrats should not rule out anything.
“We need to discuss every option,” he told the Passauer Neue Presse.
Meanwhile, the fate of another key figure in the German coalition talks could be decided later. Horst Seehofer, the leader of the Christian Social Union which forms the Bavaria-only part of Mrs Merkel’s conservative bloc, was due to hold talks with senior party members late on Thursday.
There was widespread speculation of a party shake-up.
Mr Seehofer’s party lost a significant share of its voters to the upstart nationalist party Alternative for Germany in the September 24 national election. The Christian Social Union is keen to avoid a similar blow in next year’s Bavarian vote, putting pressure on its 68-year-old leader to step aside and make way for a younger rival.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article