A fresh round of talks to restore powersharing in Northern Ireland must find a solution in “weeks rather than months”, leaders have been warned.
Northern Ireland Secretary Karen Bradley and Irish foreign affairs minister Simon Coveney confirmed at Stormont that fresh negotiations will begin next Wednesday.
Mrs Bradley said there were still “significant difficulties to overcome” but she believed a resolution is possible.
A deal must be secured in “weeks rather than months”, Mr Coveney said.
Failure to make “rapid progress” will mean the UK government will face significant decisions, including setting a budget for the new financial year, Mrs Bradley said.
MLA pay and a fresh election would also be looked at and “ultimately other arrangements” she warned.
Mrs Bradley said the need for a solution was “urgent” and the political consequences of failing to reach a deal would present a “significant setback to the progress” made since the Belfast Agreement.
“A short, intense set of political talks to restore the executive” will begin on Wednesday.
“Based on my conversations so far, I believe it is possible to reach agreement,” Mrs Bradley said before insisting she was “not thinking” about the talks failing.
She added: “Progress must be swift. It is clear that Northern Ireland needs strong devolved government and political leadership.
“The people of Northern Ireland cannot continue to have their public services suffer by the lack of an executive and without ministers making the key policy and budget decisions.”
Mrs Bradley said she will be updating Parliament on the progress of the talks “no later than February 7”.
Mr Coveney said all parties were “very conscious of the time pressures”.
“I think we are talking about weeks rather than months here,” said the Irish deputy prime minister.
“The pressures have been building for some months now in the context of decisions that need political input from a devolved government here in Northern Ireland that can’t be made in the absence of the being possible.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here