A major recruitment contract for the Ministry of Defence has failed to deliver more than £100 million in planned savings so far, new figures reveal.
A Tory former defence minister urged the Army to come up with a “Plan B” for its recruitment in the wake of the findings “rather than continuing to have to rely on Capita’s poor performance”.
The £1.3 billion contract with the outsourcing giant has resulted in just £2.73 million of savings in its first six years, according to figures released to Parliament.
This compares to £104.33 million of reduced costs earmarked in the project’s original business case in September 2011.
The MoD said it still expected to achieve virtually the same level of savings over the 10-year contract, citing increased savings on military staff.
Labour MP Kevan Jones, a former defence minister, said: “The chaotic Capita contract has failed to meet targets and is undermining the strength of the British Army in the process.
“It is also concerning that ministers are now saying that increased spending on this contract will only be offset by increased savings in military manpower costs, at a time that MoD plans to cut troop numbers by thousands are being reported.”
Conservative MP Mark Francois, another former defence minister, last year wrote a report saying that the Army was missing its recruitment targets by up to 30%.
He told the Press Association: “In my report on military recruitment, I highlighted that the Capita recruitment contract for the Army has been seriously under performing for several years and so I recommended that the Army should come up with a “Plan B”.
“In light of recent events, I believe that work should be accelerated so that the Army has a viable alternative rather than continuing to have to rely on Capita’s poor performance.”
In October it emerged that the Army would be replacing 120 full-time reservists running careers centres with civilian staff employed by Capita.
Savings over the life of the contract include costs that would have been incurred if recruitment had continued to rely heavily on military personnel instead of civilian staff.
Responding to a question from shadow defence secretary Nia Griffith, defence minister Mark Lancaster said: “The recruiting partnership project is a 10-year output based contract between the Army and Capita, designed to incentivise the provider to deliver the right quantity and quality of recruits.
“The main gate business case, in September 2011, forecast £267 million of benefits over the life of the project. The revised benefits forecast, approved in May 2016, is £266 million.
“The shortfall in benefits in the early years reflects additional funding injections, including to enable defence recruiting system delivery.
“We expect these to be offset in later years by increased savings in military manpower costs.”
An Army spokesman added: “We are only halfway through a 10-year contract and are confident that we will meet the savings of £266 million in the next four years.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel