Emma Watson has shown off her new Time’s Up tattoo – complete with grammatical error.
The Beauty And The Beast star, 27, was pictured at the Vanity Fair post-Oscars party in a black sleeveless dress.
But the large Time’s Up tattoo on her right arm was missing an apostrophe.
Emma Watson (PA)
@JosieThomas4 wrote on Twitter: “EmmaWatson I love you but I pray that tattoo isn’t real.”
Oh @EmmaWatson I love you but I pray that tattoo isn’t real.
— .Josie C Thomas. (@JosieThomas4) March 5, 2018
A tattoo supporting the Time’s Up campaign on the arm of Emma Watson (PA)
But @fairyth0ughts wrote: “Imagine Emma Watson getting a tattoo to celebrate a brilliant movement and the only thing people can talk about is the fact an apostrophe was missed on the tat.”
imagine emma watson getting a tattoo to celebrate a brilliant movement and the only thing people can talk about is the fact an apostrophe was missed on the tat. fair enough it shouldn’t have been, but that probs wasn’t even her fault lol give her a break
— amy (@fairyth0ughts) March 5, 2018
It is not known whether the tattoo is a temporary or permanent inking.
Stars arrived on the red carpet at the Academy Awards wearing pins for the Time’s Up movement, which was triggered by movie mogul Harvey Weinstein’s downfall.
Last month, it emerged that Harry Potter actress Watson made a £1 million donation to a new fund that will help set up a framework and provide support for those affected by sexual harassment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here