WORK on transforming an old hospital into a housing development could have “negative health impacts” for Edinburgh Zoo’s two giant pandas on loan from China, the Scottish Government has said.
It has put Edinburgh City Council on notice it may take over the decision-making process for the redevelopment of
Corstorphine Hospital, which sits at the south west corner of the zoo.
A letter to Edinburgh City Council said the move was “in view of concerns which could raise issues of national importance” which included possible “negative health impacts” for the two giant pandas.
Giant pandas, Yang Guang and Tian Tian, were loaned to Edinburgh Zoo in 2011 by China as a symbol of the growing
friendship between the two nations. Despite failing to produce offspring, they are among the zoo’s top attractions.
The latest intervention in a local council’s decision-making process comes just days after Scottish ministers were criticised for calling in the proposed offshore element of a Chinese-backed wind farm development at the former Cockenzie power station in East Lothian. The announcement came during the First Minister’s visit to China, when she met representatives of China’s State
Development and Investment Corporation (SDIC), which has links to the wind farm development.
Scottish Labour’s Communities
spokeswoman, Monica Lennon, said: “The Scottish Government appears to be developing a habit of interfering in local democratic planning decisions, especially when Chinese interests are involved.
“Last week we discovered that SNP ministers had called in a planning application for the old Cockenzie power plant, before East Lothian Council had even had a chance to consider it and on the day the First Minister met with the Chinese company behind the application.
“Now they are putting Edinburgh City Council on notice its decision on a site next to Edinburgh Zoo is being watched, because it might affect the Chinese pandas.
“The Scottish Government should let planning committees get on with their job and stop undermining the role of councils and local democracy.”
Developers Sundial Dundas wants to refurbish the former community hospital. Plans for the listed building and its grounds involved creating 76 apartments including 44 new-build, along with car parking and landscaping.
The average selling price for the new
properties is said to be between £450,000 to £500,000.
An objection to the project was raised by the Royal Zoological Society of Scotland. Noise studies have been carried out close to the panda’s pen, to help determine how construction noise might affect them.
A spokesman for the Royal Zoological Society of Scotland said: “We would be concerned by any development which may disturb animals in our care, particularly sensitive species such as our giant pandas.
“We are in continuing contact with the company proposing to develop the former Corstorphine Hospital to consider actions which could be taken to ensure there would be no adverse impact on animal welfare.”
The Scottish Government move means that if the council decides to grant planning consent along with associated building consent, they must notify Scottish ministers. They will then have the choice of
deciding whether to allow the council to go ahead and determine the application or over-ride their decision-making powers.
A spokesman for the City of Edinburgh Council said: “The Scottish Government’s feedback has been received and will be considered as part of the planning process.”
A Scottish Government spokesman said: “Ministers have issued the direction in view of concerns relating to the potential impact of the proposed development including possible negative health impacts for giant pandas at Edinburgh Zoo during
construction, as raised in representations by Royal Zoological Society of Scotland.
“As the applications for both planning consent and listed building consent remain live, the Scottish Government is unable to comment further at this time.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel