AN alleged rape victim has said there is a “good chance” she would never have reported the crime had she known about a controversial new policy that could see complainers jailed for refusing to testify against their attackers.
The woman, whose case is still ongoing, said she “panicked” when she heard about the Crown Office’s new approach, which has come under renewed criticism from campaigners.
It comes after Scotland’s most senior judge, Lord Carloway, insisted victims of rape and sexual assault should not have to appear in court.
Last week, The Herald reported how Solicitor General Alison Di Rollo refused to rule out victims being jailed "in the most exceptional of circumstances" if they did not give evidence.
In a Holyrood debate urging a rethink, Scottish Labour MSP Kezia Dugdale read out a personal testimony from a victim who is currently working with Rape Crisis Scotland.
The woman said: “When my advocacy worker called to tell me about the change I immediately panicked and thought ‘this can’t be happening’.
“I am faced with the reality that there is a possibility they might force me to give evidence. Living every day with that possibility is terrible. I know it may be unlikely but I can’t help but think of the worst case scenario."
Ms Dugdale and Rape Crisis Scotland have called on the Crown to put its latest policy on hold, and instead focus on improving the court experience for victims.
A Crown Office spokesman said it was "committed to doing all it can to prevent violence against women and girls and to protect the public from serious sexual violence".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel