Boris Johnson has attacked proposals for a customs partnership after Brexit as "crazy" in a major public intervention over the way forward in the exit plan deadlock.
The Foreign Secretary was facing Theresa May across the Cabinet table after warning her favoured option would create a "whole new web of bureaucracy".
Mr Johnson returned to London for the weekly meeting of the Cabinet following a visit to the United States where he said the plan would not comply with promises to take back control, and would hamper the UK's ability to strike trade deals.
READ MORE: Scottish 'myth-making hides' country's racism problem
Divisions over how to proceed erupted at a "war cabinet" where Brexiteers rejected the customs partnership option.
But they believe a revised version will be put forward by No 10.
In an interview with the Daily Mail, Mr Johnson said: "It's totally untried and would make it very, very difficult to do free trade deals.
"If you have the new customs partnership, you have a crazy system whereby you end up collecting the tariffs on behalf of the EU at the UK frontier."
Business Secretary Greg Clark stressed on Sunday that thousands of British jobs depend on frictionless trade with Europe, in what was viewed as an attempt to revive the customs partnership model.
The "war cabinet" met last week, but failed to reach agreement on whether to back the hybrid customs partnership - which would see the UK collect import duties on behalf of the EU for goods arriving via British ports and airports - or the so-called "maximum facilitation" or "max fac" model relying on the extensive use of technology to minimise checks at the border.
READ MORE: Whitehall braces for 'week of rage' with flagship Brexit Bill
It comes as Mrs May faces two more parliamentary defeats on her Brexit plan as it nears its final stages in the House of Lords.
Peers want to remove the Prime Minister's planned exit day of March 29 2019 from flagship legislation that takes Britain out of the European Union.
A second amendment would allow EU laws to be replicated in the UK and allow future participation in its agencies.
Both proposed changes to the EU Withdrawal Bill have cross-party support in the upper chamber, which means they are likely to win in a vote.
The legislation returns for its sixth and final day at report stage in the Lords and will return for third reading on Wednesday.
Shadow Brexit minister Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town said: "On the final day of Lords Report, the main focus of our cross-party efforts to ensure the Bill is fit for purpose will be twofold.
"First, to ensure the UK continues to have strong working relations with EU agencies post-Brexit - something entirely in line with the Prime Minister's recent Mansion House speech.
"Second, to introduce greater flexibility into how we leave the EU than currently allowed for by the Government's 'fixed exit day' amendment.
"Introduced during the Commons stages of the Bill and driven no doubt by political PR, putting such a definitive deadline into law could have a negative impact on the final round of negotiations.
"On both issues, there is nothing to stop ministers coming forward with late concessions.
"Failing that, and as we've seen over the past few weeks, Peers won't be shy in giving MPs further opportunities to scrutinise the fine detail of this Bill."
READ MORE: Scottish 'myth-making hides' country's racism problem
So far, the Government has suffered 10 defeats at the hands of peers, including over a customs union and giving a decisive say to Parliament on the Brexit talks.
Meanwhile, a further change has been proposed to the legislation that would require the Government to negotiate continued membership of the EEA.
Labour peers will be ordered to abstain because it goes against official party policy.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel