THE highest stake on controversial fixed-odds betting machines will be slashed to £2 in a move welcomed by campaigners but condemned by bookies amid fears of job losses and shop closures.
The UK Government said it had chosen to "take a stand" by cutting the maximum stake on fixed-odds betting terminals [FOBTs] - dubbed the "crack cocaine" of gambling - from £100 to £2.
Its decision goes further than the recommendations of a review carried out by the gambling regulator earlier this year, which recommended the maximum stake for FOBTs should be set at or below £30.
MPs across parties joined campaigners in welcoming the decision to crack down on the machines, which can lead to punters placing bets of up to £100 every 20 seconds.
But it comes as a blow to bookmakers, which have warned it would cost betting shop jobs across the country.
The Association of British Bookmakers has predicted more than 4,000 shops could close across the gambling sector, with the loss of 21,000 jobs.
Shares in gambling firms initially fell as the big players estimated the extent of lost revenues and earnings, but the stock losses were later clawed back.
UK Culture Secretary Matt Hancock said: "When faced with the choice of halfway measures or doing everything we can to protect vulnerable people, we have chosen to take a stand.
"These machines are a social blight and prey on some of the most vulnerable in society, and we are determined to put a stop to it and build a fairer society for all."
Bookmaker William Hill warned the "unprecedented" decision could see around 900 of its betting shops become loss-making, with a number of those at risk of closure after the new £2 limit comes into effect.
The group said the stake cut could hit annual earnings by between £70 million and £100m.
It has already recently cautioned that the stake cut could leave it at risk of a foreign takeover.
Ladbrokes owner GVC and Paddy Power also warned over expected hits to their earnings from the loss of lucrative FOBT revenues.
But Tracey Crouch, Minister for Sport and Civil Society, said: "While we want a healthy gambling industry that contributes to the economy, we also need one that does all it can to protect players."
She added: "It is right that we take decisive action now to ensure a responsible gambling industry that protects the most vulnerable in our society."
Tom Watson, deputy leader of the Labour Party, was among those who praised the Government's tough stance.
He said: "It's not often that the Opposition congratulates a Government minister, but Tracey Crouch has made the right decision today."
Campaigner Brian Chappell of Justice for Punters added: "These machines were introduced through the back door onto UK high streets. They've been trouble ever since.
"This decision means the betting shop environment will become safer for staff and customers."
The Government has also tasked the Gambling Commission to hold talks with the industry on potential limits on spend and time on other so-called gambling machines in casinos and arcades.
Alongside the FOBT stake announcement, it confirmed a raft of measures to clamp down on gambling, including plans to toughen up online protections, such as introducing stronger age verification rules and affordability checks.
A multimillion-pound advertising campaign promoting responsible gambling will be launched later this year.
And the age limit for playing National Lottery games will be reviewed under the next licence competition.
The Government said it will fund the crackdown through an increase in remote gaming duty.
It pledged to work with the gambling sector to ensure it has sufficient time to introduce the stake reduction and technological changes.
Speaking in the House of Commons, Ms Crouch said she expected the regulations would come before Parliament later this year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel