Lawyers for one of the families of the 22 Manchester Arena victims have called for an end to delays to the inquests into their deaths.
HM Senior Coroner for Manchester, Nigel Meadows, has indicated to the families that a pre-inquest review scheduled for June 15 will not be effective and will amount to a “short procedural hearing”, said legal firm Broudie Jackson Canter.
During a brief 15-minute hearing held at Manchester Town Hall last November, Mr Meadows adjourned proceedings and said the full inquest and further pre-hearings could not take place due to the ongoing criminal investigation by police.
Last week Greater Manchester Police said it was preparing for a trial of suicide bomber Salman Abedi’s brother, Hashem, as the application to extradite him from Libya remains ongoing after a warrant was issued for his arrest.
Speaking in November, Mr Meadows said the inquest proceedings must by law be suspended pending a criminal trial, in the event that Hashem Abedi, 21, – understood to be in custody in Libya – is brought back to the UK to face charges over the Manchester Arena bombing.
He said under these circumstances it was not possible or practical to proceed with the inquest hearings.
But Elkan Abrahamson, a solicitor with Broudie Jackson Canter, said: “There is something wrong with a process which is supposed to put the families and victims front and centre of the process but ends up marginalising them and making no progress.
“There may be sound legal reasons for some delay but there is no sense of urgency here even a year on.
“It seems inevitable that a High Court judge will be appointed – this could have been done a year ago. Even the Grenfell Inquiry, for all its faults, has at least begun in less than a year. We will be asking the Chief Coroner to explain the delay and to get things moving.”
Salman Abedi, 22, detonated the device at the end of an Ariana Grande concert on May 22 last year with 353 people, including 175 children, around him in the foyer of the arena venue.
More than 800 people were either physically or psychologically injured from the blast.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here